(think carefully about how you will control all the other variables except the one you are going to manipulate; please indicate by which activities you are involved as a whole team and by which you are going to divide responsibilities, in this case, put down, who is responsible for what):
4.
Por favor, usa esta ferramenta para procurar informações e avaliar a sua fiabilidade.
Elementos de prova / principais conclusões / resumo das informações relevantes para a hipótese)
Tipo e fonte de evidência
Fiabilidade taxa
Comentários
6. According to the data you collected, where do you owe the error of this myth?
Source
This technique is defined as “selectively choosing data leading to the desired conclusion that differs from the conclusion arising from all the available data”.
Ignorance of information and arbitrary conclusion.
This involves demanding unrealistic levels of proof or misrepresenting the nature of scientific uncertainty. As science is typically probabilistic, calls for absolute scientific certainty effectively cast doubt on scientific findings. This denialist technique is known as the “Scientific Certainty Argumentation Method”.
Simplifying a situation in such a way as to distort understanding, leading to erroneous conclusions