In this module, you are invited to falsify or confirm a common statement about Evolution. Depart from an introductory video where some evolution-related statements are brought up and discuss them in groups. Group discussion will lead to selecting a myth-busting activity where you will look for evidence to falsify or confirm a chosen statement. Based on the nature of this topic, this activity will be conducted based on secondary evidence (searches from the internet) (see Figure 1).
Through this activity, you will learn to assess the reliability of information sources (science/research databases, popular science, and other media). After making conclusions, you will prepare to present your findings to your classmates (or other audiences) in a relevant and convincing manner (e.g. in the form of video posts). Furthermore, you will be asked to write an answer letter to a parent requesting to exempt their child from lessons on Evolution (activity 6).
Please watch the introductory video 1 - Evolution and/or introductory video 2 - Monkey Business. Put down your initial thoughts and feelings about the issues presented.
After watching the video, you are invited to discuss the topic in small groups (4-6 members).
Although some people have attacked evolution as “just a theory,” that would be raising Darwin’s idea to a level it doesn’t deserve.
A theory has its genesis in a hypothesis, which is a working assumption as to why we observe something—an educated guess. To test this assumption, scientists conduct experiments that either disprove or correlate with the hypothesis. Over time, if a hypothesis continues to stand up to scrutiny and many different experiments, the scientific community may begin referring to it as a “theory.” In essence, this means that because the hypothesis has not been disproved over many years and no other known hypothesis works, then we can be reasonably sure that it’s accurate. Theories, however, are not imperishable. If new technology allows better experimentation, for example, a theory may need to be discarded.
Two problems prevent anyone from legitimately calling evolution a theory. First, there’s no direct, observable experiment that can ever be performed. Scientists can measure bones, study mutations, decode DNA, and notice similarities in morphology (the form and structure of animals and plants), but they can never test evolutionary events in the past. Some point to natural selection as a form of “evolution in action,” but natural selection can only act upon the genetic potential that already exists. What we do observe from natural selection fits perfectly with a recent creation and does not point to common descent. Secondly, and related to the above, evolution misses the mark as a theory because all the supposed “tests” to confirm Darwinism do not necessarily and distinctively correspond to the idea. In other words, each has an alternate and equally viable explanation. A theory requires that the confirming experiments correspond to one specific hypothesis. Otherwise, the experiment cannot establish legitimacy. Evolution has no such legitimacy.
Science is a systematic study of natural phenomena based on observations, identification, description, experimental investigation and theoretical explanation.
Evolution does not fit the strict definition of science. It cannot be or measured. To observe evolution in the past is extremely difficult because of the unknown variables that may have been present in the past.
“If evolution were true, then modern humans descended from apes. (After all, we’ve seen many scientific charts showing apes as man’s ancestors). So, since apes still exist, they didn’t turn into humans, and evolutionists are being silly when they say apes evolved into humans. Case closed!”
Biological evolution is the supposed process by which the first cell evolved into the diversity of life we see today. Natural selection and mutations are considered its driving force; however, evolution has never been observed despite numerous protestations to the contrary. Natural selection and mutations cannot add the information necessary to change one kind of organism into another. And it doesn’t take a science degree to understand why molecules-to-man evolution is impossible.
The fossil record shows an explosion of new forms of life in the Cambrian period but shows no trace of their supposed evolutionary precursors. Further, the abrupt appearance of new biological forms is a recurring phenomenon throughout the history of life. The fossil record repeatedly documents sudden arrivals of new life forms. For more on this, see “The Fossil Record and Universal Common Ancestry,” an article by Günter Bechly and Stephen Meyer that documents 19 explosions or abrupt appearances of new biological forms in the fossil record. (from the book Theistic Evolution: A Scientific, Philosophical, and Theological Critique).
Modifications in an individual caused by its environment, in other words, the use or disuse of a structure during its lifetime, could be inherited by its offspring and, thus, bring about change in a species.
Possible formats:
The following criteria will help you to develop your presentation:
In this activity, you are invited to present your video, poster, etc. to the others. Please be ready to answer your classmates and teacher's questions and comments!
Also, during the presentation of the other groups, you are invited to give constructive feedback to your classmates.
What do you think of the feedback that you got from your peers? Is it helpful, so you can use it and make an even better video next time? Is it fair? Discuss it within your group!
In this activity, you are asked to think about the answer to the letter that the parents of one of the students (12th grade) sent to the principal of ________ High School with a request to exempt their child from lessons on the topic of Evolution and from studying it because the creationist approach to the origin of the Earth and life is advocated at home.
Similarly to any other accredited school in the country, the school follows the national curriculum, which includes the topic of Evolution, which is based on an up-to-date scientific understanding.
Help the principal of ________ High School prepare a response to the parents that respects their religious beliefs but at the same time does not conflict with the implementation of the national curriculum.
The length of the letter could be 250-500 words. Try to be polite and to devise as many scientific explanations as possible to justify your decision.